Key
Takeaways
Only 69% of BOMs tested degraded by < 2%.
This was similar to the 72% reported in last year’s Scorecard, with a median degradation following DH of 1.3% for BOMs produced in 2022 and 1.6% for BOMs produced in 2023. Similar to TC, the number of outliers and failures has also increased. See the Power Degradation graph below for more.
Test Result Spotlight
A recent example of post-DH2000 delamination is shown here, with bubbles encroaching from the glass//glass laminate edge (under the frame) to the bussing ribbon and onto the cell surface. This creates a safety risk by forming a potential path from the module’s current carrying parts to the grounded frame, and is a non-compliance for IEC 61730. The potential root causes of this could be various cost cutting measures, including the use of POE + EVA encapsulant rather than more traditional POE + POE; a reduction in encapsulant thickness; and/or a reduction in lamination time.
Bubbles can be seen on both sides of the busbar extending from under the frame to the cell, as well as on the cell surface (on the right side of the image).
Power Degradation of DH BOMs
Percentage of results shown that are post-BO stabilization: 19% of 2018, 46% of 2019, 95% of 2022, 86% of 2021. All 2022 and 2023 results are post-DH2000 (pre-BO stabilization), which is the stage in DH testing used to determine Top Performers for the 2024 Scorecard. Some outliers with >10% degradation are not shown.
Outliers with >10% degradation are not shown. In some cases, these cause a significant reduction in the mean.
View Box Plot Interpretation GuideA case study on why TC is important, what PV module materials are assessed, and the test procedure can be found here on kiwa.com/pvel .
Procure better modules. Get access to the
Scorecard data every quarter.
Sign up as a Kiwa PVEL Premium Partner